# Electromagnetic Spectrum Vs. Neutronics Spectrum

Thank you Goddard Space Flight Center for this explanation:

We may think that radio waves are completely different physical objects or events than gamma-rays. They are produced in very different ways, and we detect them in different ways. But are they really different things? The answer is ‘no’. Radio waves, visible light, X-rays, and all the other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are fundamentally the same thing. They are all electromagnetic radiation

Electromagnetic radiation can be described in terms of a stream of photons, which are massless particles each traveling in a wave-like pattern and moving at the speed of light. Each photon contains a certain amount (or bundle) of energy, and all electromagnetic radiation consists of these photons. The only difference between the various types of electromagnetic radiation is the amount of energy found in the photons. Radio waves have photons with low energies, microwaves have a little more energy than radio waves, infrared has still more, then visible, ultraviolet, X-rays, and … the most energetic of all … gamma-rays.

Actually, the electromagnetic spectrum can be expressed in terms of energy, wavelength, or frequency. Each way of thinking about the EM spectrum is related to the others in a precise mathematical way. So why do we have three ways of describing things, each with a different set of physical units? After all, frequency is measured in cycles per second (which is called a Hertz), wavelength is measured in meters, and energy is measured in electron volts.

Thank you Goddard!, Now, this is what the electromagnetic spectrum looks like as the radio frequency spectrum is over crowded:

So hmmmmm… that is the electomagnetic spectrum. What then is the Neutronics Spectrum?

First, one has to actually ‘get’ Newton’s Third law of motion. Thank you Phycis Classroom for this explanation:

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

The statement means that in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the forces on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object. The direction of the force on the first object is opposite to the direction of the force on the second object. Forces always come in pairs – equal and opposite action-reaction force pairs.

Well of course we all understand opposites. Don’t we? Then why do we not think in opposites of forces when it comes to a force itself?

Electromagnetic Spectrum FORCE is opposite of the Neutronics Spectrum FORCE.

And since the electromagetic FORCE is only 4% of the entire Universe, that makes it the nonzero opposite of whatever it is that is 96% of the Universe. (Careful with that 96% calculation it is measured only on observable inductions.)

There are explanations of what the opposite of the Electromagnetic Spectrum might be:

One such is contained in the book The Force Is With Us: The Higher Consciousness That Science Refuses to Accept By Thomas Walker.

The normal accepted response to the opposite of the electomagetic spectrum is best phrased in the question, what is the opposite of light? Most will respond ‘dark’. Which of course is merely the absence of light. The opposite of light (which is only a range of frequencies in the electromagnetic spectrum and just happens to be the range in which our eyes receive those frequencies in) is but a range of frequencies in the opposing spectrum.

From an overly crowded frequency range:

To a completely clear frequency range:

The Neutronics Spectrum, Neutricity itself is untapped, unregulated and finally available for use.